Top 25: Outside Influence in Nebraska Politics
The 25 non-candidate organizations (PACs, party committees, super PACs, unions, trade and issue groups, ballot committees, businesses and nonprofits) that put the most money into Nebraska politics, from NADC and FEC filings. Money Map · Local funds · Method
What "outside influence" means here: money from any organization other than a candidate, a candidate's own committee, or an individual donor: direct contributions (cash, in-kind, loans and pledge payments as filed; unpaid pledges are not counted), independent / third-party expenditures, and ballot committee campaign spending. It does not mean out-of-state; use the origin filter for that, based on the state in each filing. Payment processors (ActBlue, WinRed, Anedot) are excluded because they pass along individual gifts. Individuals are never named.
As of the NADC data file updated 2026-10-27 02:38 CT and FEC bulk files; built 2026-10-27 14:34 CT. FEC: cycle.
All organizations, 2026 (partial, as of 2026-10-27) (gross)
$174,870,527
2,364 organizations
Net of transfers between organizations
$132,886,349
each dollar counted once
Top 25 shown (Direct (own spending & gifts to candidates))
$95,737,094
All levels · Any origin
Export Top 25 · Verified public filings (25 rows ready)
Top 25 at a glance
$23,014,815
$11,954,178
$11,108,917
$9,147,069
$7,079,253
$3,498,316
$3,166,327
$2,511,917
$2,475,000
$2,059,628
$2,055,000
$2,022,812
$1,883,700
$1,701,235
$1,501,308
$1,500,000
$1,428,068
$1,256,857
$1,183,000
$1,182,000
$887,239
$821,997
$800,000
$749,310
$749,149
Bars are teal-green unless a party affiliation is filed (FEC committee party, or party named in a filed party committee name): Dollar amount (no party filed)RepublicanDemocraticLibertarian
| # | Organization | Type | Direct amount | Gross in | Via documented intermediaries | Origin | Top recipients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TAX RELIEF NEBRASKA NADC filings ↗ · NADC filer ID | Ballot question committee | $23,014,815 | $23,014,815 | $0 | Unknown no state in filings | (Ballot measure campaign spending) ($23,014,815) |
| 2 | NEBRASKA VALUES PAC FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $11,954,178 | $11,954,178 | $0 | Nebraska FEC committee address: NE | Ricketts, Pete (US Senate) (oppose) ($11,420,249); Osborn, Dan (US Senate) (support) ($533,928) |
| 3 | DEFEND AMERICAN JOBS FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $11,108,917 | $11,108,917 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: VA | Osborn, Dan (US Senate) (oppose) ($10,825,942); Smith, Adrian (US House NE-03) (support) ($282,975) |
| 4 | WORKING CLASS MAJORITY PAC, INC FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | PAC | $9,147,069 | $9,147,069 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: DE | Osborn, Dan (US Senate) (support) ($6,053,621); Ricketts, Pete (US Senate) (oppose) ($3,093,448) |
| 5 | CORNHUSKER MAJORITY FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $7,079,253 | $7,079,253 | $0 | Nebraska FEC committee address: NE | Osborn, Dan (US Senate) (oppose) ($6,947,016); Ricketts, Pete (US Senate) (support) ($132,237) |
| 6 | SLF PAC FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $3,498,316 | $3,498,316 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: DC | Osborn, Dan (US Senate) (oppose) ($3,326,647); Ricketts, Pete (US Senate) (support) ($171,669) |
| 7 | FAIRNESS FOR GIRLS NADC filings ↗ · NADC filer ID | Ballot question committee | $3,166,327 | $3,166,327 | $0 | Unknown no state in filings | (Ballot measure campaign spending) ($3,166,327) |
| 8 | RESPECT NEBRASKA VOTERS NADC filings ↗ · NADC filer ID | Ballot question committee | $2,511,917 | $2,511,917 | $0 | Unknown no state in filings | (Ballot measure campaign spending) ($2,511,917) |
| 9 | THE EDGE ACTION FUND (SUPERPAC) no filer record · spender name only ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $2,475,000 | $2,475,000 | $0 | Unknown no state in filings | Osborn, Dan (US Senate) (support) ($1,361,250); Ricketts, Pete (US Senate) (oppose) ($1,113,750) |
| 10 | WIN IT BACK PAC FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $2,059,628 | $2,059,628 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: DC | Osborn, Dan (US Senate) (oppose) ($2,059,628) |
| 11 | FREEDOM FROM POLITICS no filer record · spender name only ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $2,055,000 | $2,055,000 | $0 | Unknown no state in filings | Ricketts, Pete (US Senate) (oppose) ($2,055,000) |
| 12 | FIGHT FOR NEBRASKA PAC FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $2,022,812 | $2,022,812 | $0 | Nebraska FEC committee address: NE | Powell, Denise (US House NE-02) (support) ($1,347,462); Cavanaugh, John (US House NE-02) (oppose) ($675,350) |
| 13 | DEMOCRACY NEBRASKA NADC filings ↗ · contributor name matches NADC filer name (name-only match) ⚑ Chain hopsMoney passed to other organizations that then spent in Nebraska (counted once, at the end of the chain):
| PAC | $1,883,700 | $2,853,700 | $970,000 | Nebraska 100% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | PRESERVE THE GOOD LIFE ($820,000); LYNNE WALZ ($351,000); JOCELYN BRASHER ($125,400); JOHN FREDRICKSON ($120,000) +22 more |
| 14 | RETIRE CAREER POLITICIANS FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $1,701,235 | $1,701,235 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: DC | Flood, Mike (US House NE-01) (oppose) ($892,284); Ricketts, Pete (US Senate) (oppose) ($533,523); Backemeyer, Christopher (US House NE-01) (support) ($275,429) |
| 15 | HMP FEC filings ↗ · FEC committee ID | PAC | $1,501,308 | $1,501,308 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: DC | Harding, Brinker (US House NE-02) (oppose) ($1,496,308); POWELL, DENISE ($5,000) |
| 16 | RGA RIGHT DIRECTION PAC no filer record · name only ⚑ | Federal PAC | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | $0 | Outside NE 0% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | JIM PILLEN ($1,500,000) |
| 17 | CLF FEC filings ↗ · spender name matches filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | PAC | $1,428,068 | $1,428,068 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: DC | Powell, Denise (US House NE-02) (oppose) ($1,428,068) |
| 18 | NEBRASKA UNITED NADC filings ↗ · contributor name matches NADC filer name (name-only match) ⚑ Chain hopsMoney passed to other organizations that then spent in Nebraska (counted once, at the end of the chain):
| PAC | $1,256,857 | $1,341,857 | $85,000 | Nebraska 100% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | Jim Pillen — Nebraska - Governor (support) ($675,376); Target not stated in filing (not stated in filing) ($174,529); Jess Goldoni — Nebraska - State Legislature - 18 (oppose) ($97,293); Suann Witt — Nebraska - State Legislature - 14 (oppose) ($93,678) +6 more |
| 19 | COMMON SENSE NEBRASKA NADC filings ↗ · contributor name matches NADC filer name (name-only match) ⚑ | PAC | $1,183,000 | $1,183,000 | $0 | Nebraska 100% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | JOEY SPELLERBERG ($965,000); Mark Martinez — Douglas - County Sheriff (oppose) ($130,000); AARON HANSON ($63,000); CORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVES ($25,000) |
| 20 | CONSERVATIVE AMERICANS PAC FEC filings ↗ · FEC committee ID | Independent expenditure / Super PAC | $1,182,000 | $1,182,000 | $0 | Outside NE FEC committee address: MA | REAL CHANGE PAC ($1,182,000) |
| 21 | NEBRASKANS FOR A STRONGER FUTURE NADC filings ↗ · contributor name matches NADC filer name (name-only match) ⚑ Chain hopsMoney passed to other organizations that then spent in Nebraska (counted once, at the end of the chain):
| PAC | $887,239 | $987,239 | $100,000 | Nebraska 100% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | SUANN WITT ($123,700); DARIN TOMPKINS ($117,700); CINDY MAXWELL-OSTDIEK ($101,700); Bill Bowes — Nebraska - State Legislature - 14 (oppose) ($100,816) +8 more |
| 22 | GOOD GOVERNMENT LINCOLN PROJECT NADC filings ↗ · contributor name matches NADC filer name (name-only match) ⚑ Chain hopsMoney passed to other organizations that then spent in Nebraska (counted once, at the end of the chain):
| Ballot question committee | $821,997 | $1,296,997 | $475,000 | Nebraska 100% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | (Ballot measure campaign spending) ($821,997); FORWARD LINCOLN ($475,000) |
| 23 | GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS PAC no filer record · entity name match (name-only) ⚑ | PAC | $800,000 | $800,000 | $0 | Outside NE 0% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | LYNNE WALZ ($800,000) |
| 24 | CONSERVATION PAC NADC filings ↗ · contributor name matches NADC filer name (name-only match) ⚑ Chain hopsMoney passed to other organizations that then spent in Nebraska (counted once, at the end of the chain):
| PAC | $749,310 | $854,310 | $105,000 | Nebraska 100% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | CAROL BLOOD ($322,115); SARA KOHEN ($126,134); BRYAN SECK ($85,000); NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ($80,000) +11 more |
| 25 | PRESERVE THE GOOD LIFE NADC filings ↗ · contributor name matches NADC filer name (name-only match) ⚑ Chain hopsMoney passed to other organizations that then spent in Nebraska (counted once, at the end of the chain):
| PAC | $749,149 | $899,149 | $150,000 | Nebraska 100% of dated amounts list a Nebraska address | AMERICA FIRST PARTY ($150,000); Taylor Royal — Nebraska - State Legislature - 18 (oppose) ($148,350); Target not stated in filing (not stated in filing) ($74,137); Merv Riepe — Nebraska - State Legislature - 12 (oppose) ($62,566) +10 more |
⚑ name-only match: the contributor name on a filing matches a registered filer's name, but no ID links them; such matches are flagged and never used to merge differently named organizations. Direct counts only what an organization itself gave to candidates and non-ranked committees or spent on independent expenditures / ballot campaigns; money it gave to another ranked organization is counted at that organization instead. Via pass-through credits an intermediary's spending to its documented organizational funders in proportion to their share of its filed receipts. See methodology.