⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 26, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction
Payments to Vendors › PITZER DIGITAL

PITZER DIGITAL

Filed as: PITZER DIGITAL
What this shows. Payments to vendors are lawful, itemized disclosures that committees must report. This view lists what FEC and NADC filings report each committee paid each payee organization. It does not indicate wrongdoing. A vendor's relationship to a candidate (for example a candidate-owned firm) is shown only when a filing states it; otherwise none is asserted. Payments to individuals (staff, reimbursements) are combined into one "Individuals (aggregated)" line and no names are shown. Transfers between committees are excluded here (see Money Map). Rules & keyword categories.
2023–24 cycle
$1,389
FEC — · NADC $1,389 · 3 payments

2023–24 cycle as of 2026-10-26 · by year: 2022 $1,000 · 2024 $389

PayerTypeSourcePaymentsTotal
JOHNSTON FOR LEGISLATURECandidateNADC nadc-91511$1,000
OERTWICH FOR COMMISSIONER
Candidate: DOUG OERTWICH
CandidateNADC nadc-92841$347
CLARK FOR LEGISLATURE
Candidate: ETHAN CLARK
CandidateNADC nadc-87331$42
Largest 3 filings
DatePayerPurpose (filing text)AmountFiling
2022-05-13JOHNSTON FOR LEGISLATURECAMPAIGN AD$1,000NADC expenditure 35386 ↗
2024-04-22OERTWICH FOR COMMISSIONERAD IN STANTON COUNTY NEWSPAPER$347NADC expenditure 45748 ↗
2024-04-08CLARK FOR LEGISLATURENEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION$42NADC expenditure 43114 ↗