PL
Plains Ledger
Nebraska Political & Non Profit Financial Intelligence
⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 25, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction

Committee Comparison — PACs, Parties & Organizations (2021-22 cycle)

Compare two committees or organizations — PAC vs. PAC, party vs. party, Super PAC vs. Super PAC — across funding sources, shared cross-over funders, transfers, top payees, and independent expenditures (support vs. oppose). Also compare two ballot measures or two election cycles.
This page compares committees and organizations (PACs, parties, Super PACs, unions, ballot committees). Candidate campaign committees are compared on Candidate Comparison.Compare candidates → Candidate Comparison
The link you followed points to a candidate committee. Candidate matchups now live on Candidate Comparison · candidate profile (SARAH SLATTERY).
Comparison Export · Verified public filings (10 rows ready)
Committee Comparison — Funding Streams & Shared Funders

⚔ Committee vs. Committee — Funders, Shared Funders & Independent Expenditures

Side-by-side funding streams for two committees or organizations: conduit volume, labor, business, party and ideological PAC money, IE support/oppose, in-state vs. out-of-state share, and shared cross-over funders.

Box colors:RepublicanDemocraticIndependent (blue) / other party (gray)Nonpartisan office (party not shown)DSA Funding tie to a DSA-affiliated committee in filings (how badges work)
Committee A (NADC)
$1.85M
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Committee B (NADC)
$382.2K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Funding side by side

CONSERVATIVE NEBRASKA vs. NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PAC

Mirrored bars: A grows left, B grows right from the category spine. Bars in each group share one scale. Darker segment = in-state (NE), lighter = out-of-state.
A · CONSERVATIVE NEBRASKA
Category
B · NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PAC
Direct contributions
$1.85M
Total raised
$382.2K
Online conduits
$0
ActBlue
$0
$0
WinRed / Anedot
$0
Outside spending (independent expenditures)
$0
IE support (+)
$0
$0
IE oppose (−)
$0
Itemized receipts by geography
$1.81M
97.7% of itemized
In-state (NE)
$382.2K
100% of itemized
$43.5K
2.3% of itemized
Out-of-state
$0
Committee & PAC sources
$0
Labor & unions
$0
$0
Business / trade
$0
$0
Party
$0
$0
Ideological / leadership
$0
Visual 3 · Dual-Candidate Network Graph (Exclusive vs. Shared / Cross-Over Ties)

All Funding Ties Network Map: CONSERVATIVE NEBRASKA vs. NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PAC

Left column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to CONSERVATIVE NEBRASKA; Center column highlights 0 Shared / Cross-Over Funders & Opposing Super PACs touching BOTH committees; Right column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PAC. Click any node to inspect.
● ActBlue● WinRed/Anedot● Union / 501(c)(5)● Business / PAC━ IE Support (+)┅ IE Oppose (-)
EXCLUSIVE TO CONSERVATIVE NEBRASKA (2)CANDIDATE HUBS & SHARED / CROSS-OVER TIES (0)EXCLUSIVE TO NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATI (0)0 Shared Institutional FundersCompletely distinct donor & Super PAC coalitionsCONSERVATIVE NEBRASKARaised $1.85M NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATIRaised $382.2K RESTORE THE GOOD LIFEBusiness (For-Profit and N$280.0KHILLWOOD DEVELOPMENT CO.Business (For-Profit and N$25.0K
Detailed list: all funding ties (2)
Visual 4 · Complete Side-by-Side Funding Ties Ledger

All Institutional Funders, Conduits, Unions & Super PAC IE Spenders (2 of 2)

Funder / Conduit / Super PACCategory & BasisCONSERVATIVE NEBRASKA TieNEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PAC TieCombined Volume
RESTORE THE GOOD LIFE
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
$280,000
—$280,000
HILLWOOD DEVELOPMENT CO.
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
$25,000
—$25,000

Committee-Level Expenditure & Vendor Inspector

Showing 330 committees in cycle
Region: Omaha, NE (NE-02 (Omaha / Douglas–Sarpy))
Gross Receipts
$1,851,592
Net: $1,851,592
Disbursements
$1,849,657
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 97.7% ($1.81M)Out-of-State: 2.3% ($44K)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

Organization / PACStateAmount
RESTORE THE GOOD LIFENE$280,000
HILLWOOD DEVELOPMENT CO.TX$25,000

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
ARMADA STRATEGIESOPPOSE CHARLES HERBSTER FOR GOVERNOR$1,177,000
ARAMADA STRATEGIESARAMADA STRATEGIES 2637 E ATLANTIC BLVD #43878 POMPANO BEACH$315,392
AXIOM STRATEGIESAXIOM STRATEGIES 800 W 47TH ST STE 200 KANSAS CITY MO 64112$276,581
RAWHIDE MEDIA LLCRAWHIDE MEDIA, LLC 1309 COFFEEN AVENUE SUITE 1200 SHERIDAN W$55,869
SMARTCALL MEDIANOT LISTED$13,988
THE TUESDAY GROUP, LLCCONSULTING$10,000
Region: Statewide
Gross Receipts
$382,236
Net: $382,236
Disbursements
$471,235
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($382K)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

No itemized non-individual contributors in this period.

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
PRESERVE THE GOOD LIFELincoln$108,000
FRIENDS OF LINDSTROMOmaha$25,425
CLARK CREATIVE GROUPNOT LISTED$25,000
BOWERS FOR NEBRASKALincoln$20,000
LAURITSEN FOR NEBRASKAGretna$20,000
ROYERS FOR NEBRASKAOmaha$20,000