PL
Plains Ledger
Nebraska Political & Non Profit Financial Intelligence
⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 25, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction

Committee Comparison — PACs, Parties & Organizations (2017-18 cycle)

Compare two committees or organizations — PAC vs. PAC, party vs. party, Super PAC vs. Super PAC — across funding sources, shared cross-over funders, transfers, top payees, and independent expenditures (support vs. oppose). Also compare two ballot measures or two election cycles.
This page compares committees and organizations (PACs, parties, Super PACs, unions, ballot committees). Candidate campaign committees are compared on Candidate Comparison.Compare candidates → Candidate Comparison
Comparison Export · Verified public filings (10 rows ready)
Committee Comparison — Funding Streams & Shared Funders

⚔ Committee vs. Committee — Funders, Shared Funders & Independent Expenditures

Side-by-side funding streams for two committees or organizations: conduit volume, labor, business, party and ideological PAC money, IE support/oppose, in-state vs. out-of-state share, and shared cross-over funders.

Box colors:RepublicanDemocraticIndependent (blue) / other party (gray)Nonpartisan office (party not shown)DSA funding tie Funding tie to a DSA-affiliated committee in filings (how badges work)The DSA logo identifies the organization named in public filings. Plains Ledger is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DSA. A badge indicates a documented funding tie only.
Committee A (NADC)
COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE OMAHA ↗
Ballot question committee · nadc-18BQC00461
$107.5K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Committee B (NADC)
$22.0K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Funding side by side

COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE OMAHA vs. AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMP-NE PAC (ACEC)

Mirrored bars: A grows left, B grows right from the category spine. Bars in each group share one scale. Darker segment = in-state (NE), lighter = out-of-state.
A · COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE OMAHA
Category
B · AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMP-NE PAC (ACEC)
Direct contributions
$107.5K
Total raised
$22.0K
Online conduits
$0
ActBlue
$0
$0
WinRed / Anedot
$0
Outside spending (independent expenditures)
$0
IE support (+)
$0
$0
IE oppose (−)
$0
Itemized receipts by geography
$98.5K
91.6% of itemized
In-state (NE)
$22.0K
100% of itemized
$9.0K
8.4% of itemized
Out-of-state
$0
Committee & PAC sources
$0
Labor & unions
$0
$0
Business / trade
$0
$0
Party
$0
$2.0K
Ideological / leadership
$0
Visual 3 · Dual-Candidate Network Graph (Exclusive vs. Shared / Cross-Over Ties)

All Funding Ties Network Map: COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE OMAHA vs. AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMP-NE PAC (ACEC)

Left column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE OMAHA; Center column highlights 0 Shared / Cross-Over Funders & Opposing Super PACs touching BOTH committees; Right column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMP-NE PAC (ACEC). Click any node to inspect.
● ActBlue● WinRed/Anedot● Union / 501(c)(5)● Business / PAC━ IE Support (+)┅ IE Oppose (-)
EXCLUSIVE TO COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE O (16)CANDIDATE HUBS & SHARED / CROSS-OVER TIES (0)EXCLUSIVE TO AMERICAN COUNCIL OF EN (0)0 Shared Institutional FundersCompletely distinct donor & Super PAC coalitionsCOMMITTEE TO IMPROVE ORaised $107.5K AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENRaised $22.0K GREATER OMAHA CHAMBER PACPAC-Separate Segregated Po$15.0KSWAIN CONSTRUCTION INC.Business (For-Profit and N$11.5KHDR, INC.Business (For-Profit and N$6.0KCH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC.Business (For-Profit and N$5.0KLYMAN-RICHEY CORPORATIONBusiness (For-Profit and N$5.0KROLOFF CONSTRUCTION CO. (AKA Business (For-Profit and N$5.0KASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANYBusiness (For-Profit and N$5.0KFIRST NATIONAL OF NEBRASKABusiness (For-Profit and N$3.0KHDR ARCHITECTURE INCBusiness (For-Profit and N$3.0K
Detailed list: all funding ties (16)
Visual 4 · Complete Side-by-Side Funding Ties Ledger

All Institutional Funders, Conduits, Unions & Super PAC IE Spenders (16 of 16)

Funder / Conduit / Super PACCategory & BasisCOMMITTEE TO IMPROVE OMAHA TieAMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMP-NE PAC (ACEC) TieCombined Volume
PAC-Separate Segregated Political Fund
NADC filer/source type "PAC-Separate Segregated Political Fund" (NADC ID 13
$15,000
—$15,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA03031)
$11,500
—$11,500
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA00046)
$6,000
—$6,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 filer (ID 99CUA03185) refined by organization type (501(c)(6)
$5,000
—$5,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA00227)
$5,000
—$5,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA01776)
$5,000
—$5,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA00131)
$5,000
—$5,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA00117)
$3,000
—$3,000
HDR ARCHITECTURE INC
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
$3,000
—$3,000
PINNACLE BANK (68022)
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
$2,500
—$2,500
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 18CUA09190)
$2,500
—$2,500
PAC
NADC filer/source type "PAC-Separate Segregated Political Fund" (NADC ID 06
$2,000
—$2,000
TORCZON
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
$2,000
—$2,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA02668)
$2,000
—$2,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CON06872)
$2,000
—$2,000
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA02687)
$2,000
—$2,000

Committee-Level Expenditure & Vendor Inspector

Showing 333 committees in cycle
ENTITY A · Ballot question committee

COMMITTEE TO IMPROVE OMAHA

NADC #18BQC00461 ↗
Region: Statewide
Gross Receipts
$107,500
Net: $90,500
Disbursements
$95,380
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 91.6% ($99K)Out-of-State: 8.4% ($9K)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

Organization / PACStateAmount
GREATER OMAHA CHAMBER PACNE$15,000
SWAIN CONSTRUCTION INC.NE$11,500
HDR, INC.NE$6,000
CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC.NE$5,000
LYMAN-RICHEY CORPORATIONNE$5,000
ROLOFF CONSTRUCTION CO. (AKA L.G. ROLOFF )NE$5,000

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
LOVGREN MAKETINGMEDIA/TV/RADIO/FACEBOOK$35,831
LOVGREN MARKETINGCAMPAIGN PLANNING$30,511
SANDLE INNOCENZISALES TAX$12,000
DIVISON DNEWS BROADCAST$10,200
SANDLER INNOCENZIVOICE OVER FEE$4,638
FOSTER & DOLLECK CPASACCOUNTING$2,200
Region: Statewide
Gross Receipts
$22,048
Net: $22,048
Disbursements
$20,350
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($22K)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

No itemized non-individual contributors in this period.

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
ACEC NEBRASKAADMINISTRATION$3,000