⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 27, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction

Committee Comparison — PACs, Parties & Organizations (2026 (partial, as of 2026-10-27))

Compare two committees or organizations — PAC vs. PAC, party vs. party, Super PAC vs. Super PAC — across funding sources, shared cross-over funders, transfers, top payees, and independent expenditures (support vs. oppose). Also compare two ballot measures or two election cycles.
This page compares committees and organizations (PACs, parties, Super PACs, unions, ballot committees). Candidate campaign committees are compared on Candidate Comparison.Compare candidates → Candidate Comparison
Comparison Export · Verified public filings (10 rows ready)
Committee Comparison — Funding Streams & Shared Funders

⚔ Committee vs. Committee — Funders, Shared Funders & Independent Expenditures

Side-by-side funding streams for two committees or organizations: conduit volume, labor, business, party and ideological PAC money, IE support/oppose, in-state vs. out-of-state share, and shared cross-over funders.

Box colors:RepublicanDemocraticIndependent (blue) / other party (gray)Nonpartisan office, or no documented partyLegislature: red/blue = publicly documented party affiliation (the Legislature is officially nonpartisan on the ballot); green = no documented affiliation. SourcesDSA funding tie Funding tie to a DSA-affiliated committee in filings (how badges work)The DSA logo identifies the organization named in public filings. Plains Ledger is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DSA. A badge indicates a documented funding tie only.
Committee A (NADC)
$48.4K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Committee B (NADC)
OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUND ↗
PAC · nadc-9864
$0
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Funding side by side

CORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVES vs. OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUND

Mirrored bars: A grows left, B grows right from the category spine. Bars in each group share one scale. Darker segment = in-state (NE), lighter = out-of-state.
A · CORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVES
Category
B · OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUND
Direct contributions
$48.4K
Total raised
$0
Online conduits
$0
ActBlue
$0
$0
WinRed / Anedot
$0
Outside spending (independent expenditures)
$0
IE support (+)
$0
$0
IE oppose (−)
$0
Itemized receipts by geography
$48.4K
100% of itemized
In-state (NE)
$0
$0
Out-of-state
$0
Committee & PAC sources
$0
Labor & unions
$0
$0
Business / trade
$0
$0
Party
$0
$96.9K
Ideological / leadership
$0
Visual 3 · Dual-Candidate Network Graph (Exclusive vs. Shared / Cross-Over Ties)

All Funding Ties Network Map: CORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVES vs. OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUND

Left column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to CORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVES; Center column highlights 0 Shared / Cross-Over Funders & Opposing Super PACs touching BOTH committees; Right column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUND. Click any node to inspect.
● ActBlue● WinRed/Anedot● Union / 501(c)(5)● Business / PAC━ IE Support (+)┅ IE Oppose (-)
EXCLUSIVE TO CORNHUSKER CONSERVATIV (2)CANDIDATE HUBS & SHARED / CROSS-OVER TIES (0)EXCLUSIVE TO OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUND (0)0 Shared Institutional FundersCompletely distinct donor & Super PAC coalitionsCORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVRaised $48.4K OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUNDRaised $0 COMMON SENSE NEBRASKAPAC-Independent$25.0KOMAHA LEADERSHIP FUNDPAC-Independent$23.4K
Detailed list: all funding ties (2)
Visual 4 · Complete Side-by-Side Funding Ties Ledger

All Institutional Funders, Conduits, Unions & Super PAC IE Spenders (2 of 2)

Funder / Conduit / Super PACCategory & BasisCORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVES TieOMAHA LEADERSHIP FUND TieCombined Volume
PAC-Independent
NADC filer/source type "PAC-Independent" (NADC ID 9664)
$25,000
—$25,000
PAC-Independent
NADC filer/source type "PAC-Independent" (NADC ID 9864)
$23,431
—$23,431

Committee-Level Expenditure & Vendor Inspector

Showing 360 committees in cycle
Region: Lincoln, NE (NE-01 (Lincoln / Eastern NE))
Gross Receipts
$48,431
Net: $0
Disbursements
$41,565
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($48K)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

Organization / PACStateAmount
COMMON SENSE NEBRASKANE$25,000
OMAHA LEADERSHIP FUNDNE$23,431

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
AXIOM STRATEGIESDIRECT MAIL$47,077
REMINGTON RESEARCH GROUPTEXT MESSAGE$939
REMINGTON RESEARCHTEXT MESSAGE$567
NEBRASKA ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCLOSURE COMMISIONNADC FILING$100
Region: NE-02 (Omaha / Douglas–Sarpy)
Gross Receipts
$0
Net: $0
Disbursements
$16,556
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($0)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

No itemized non-individual contributors in this period.

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
CORNHUSKER CONSERVATIVESLincoln$23,431
HOWARD SCKOLNIKTAX PREPARATION$1,600
UNION BANK & TRUSTWIRE FEE$25