PL
Plains Ledger
Nebraska Political & Non Profit Financial Intelligence
⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 25, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction

Committee Comparison — PACs, Parties & Organizations (2015-16 cycle)

Compare two committees or organizations — PAC vs. PAC, party vs. party, Super PAC vs. Super PAC — across funding sources, shared cross-over funders, transfers, top payees, and independent expenditures (support vs. oppose). Also compare two ballot measures or two election cycles.
This page compares committees and organizations (PACs, parties, Super PACs, unions, ballot committees). Candidate campaign committees are compared on Candidate Comparison.Compare candidates → Candidate Comparison
The link you followed points to a candidate committee. Candidate matchups now live on Candidate Comparison · candidate profile (TOMMY GARRETT).
Comparison Export · Verified public filings (10 rows ready)
Committee Comparison — Funding Streams & Shared Funders

⚔ Committee vs. Committee — Funders, Shared Funders & Independent Expenditures

Side-by-side funding streams for two committees or organizations: conduit volume, labor, business, party and ideological PAC money, IE support/oppose, in-state vs. out-of-state share, and shared cross-over funders.

Box colors:RepublicanDemocraticIndependent (blue) / other party (gray)Nonpartisan office (party not shown)DSA funding tie Funding tie to a DSA-affiliated committee in filings (how badges work)The DSA logo identifies the organization named in public filings. Plains Ledger is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DSA. A badge indicates a documented funding tie only.
Committee A (FEC)
HDR, INC. PAC ↗
PAC · fec-C00103903
$971.9K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Committee B (NADC)
$88.1K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Funding side by side

HDR, INC. PAC vs. NE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION PAC (NTA)

Mirrored bars: A grows left, B grows right from the category spine. Bars in each group share one scale. Darker segment = in-state (NE), lighter = out-of-state.
A · HDR, INC. PAC
Category
B · NE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION PAC (NTA)
Direct contributions
$971.9K
Total raised
$88.1K
Online conduits
$0
ActBlue
$0
$0
WinRed / Anedot
$0
Outside spending (independent expenditures)
$0
IE support (+)
$0
$0
IE oppose (−)
$0
Itemized receipts by geography
$0
In-state (NE)
$88.1K
100% of itemized
$0
Out-of-state
$0
Committee & PAC sources
$0
Labor & unions
$0
$0
Business / trade
$0
$0
Party
$0
$0
Ideological / leadership
$0
Visual 3 · Dual-Candidate Network Graph (Exclusive vs. Shared / Cross-Over Ties)

All Funding Ties Network Map: HDR, INC. PAC vs. NE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION PAC (NTA)

Left column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to HDR, INC. PAC; Center column highlights 0 Shared / Cross-Over Funders & Opposing Super PACs touching BOTH committees; Right column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to NE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION PAC (NTA). Click any node to inspect.
● ActBlue● WinRed/Anedot● Union / 501(c)(5)● Business / PAC━ IE Support (+)┅ IE Oppose (-)
EXCLUSIVE TO HDR, INC. PAC (0)CANDIDATE HUBS & SHARED / CROSS-OVER TIES (0)EXCLUSIVE TO NE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (3)0 Shared Institutional FundersCompletely distinct donor & Super PAC coalitionsHDR, INC. PACRaised $971.9K NE TELECOMMUNICATIONS Raised $88.1K CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES, INC.Business (For-Profit and N$2.5KGLENWOOD TELEPHONE MEMBERSHIPBusiness (For-Profit and N$1.3KGLENWOOD NETWORK SERVICESBusiness (For-Profit and N$1.3K
Detailed list: all funding ties (3)
Visual 4 · Complete Side-by-Side Funding Ties Ledger

All Institutional Funders, Conduits, Unions & Super PAC IE Spenders (3 of 3)

Funder / Conduit / Super PACCategory & BasisHDR, INC. PAC TieNE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION PAC (NTA) TieCombined Volume
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
NADC Form B-7 corporation (Type=C) (NADC ID 99CUA02182)
—
$2,500
$2,500
GLENWOOD TELEPHONE MEMBERSHIP CORP.
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
—
$1,250
$1,250
GLENWOOD NETWORK SERVICES
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
—
$1,250
$1,250

Committee-Level Expenditure & Vendor Inspector

Showing 383 committees in cycle
Region: Statewide
Gross Receipts
$971,948
Net: $971,948
Disbursements
$714,717
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($972K)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

No itemized non-individual contributors in this period.

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
DSCCParty committee$30,000
NRSCParty committee$30,000
FRIENDS OF ERIK PAULSENCandidate committee$10,000
BILL SHUSTER FOR CONGRESSCandidate committee$10,000
BURR NC VICTORY FUNDPAC$10,000
HATCH ELECTION COMMITTEE INCCandidate committee$10,000
Region: Statewide
Gross Receipts
$88,139
Net: $88,139
Disbursements
$76,170
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($88K)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

Organization / PACStateAmount
CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES, INC.NE$2,500
GLENWOOD TELEPHONE MEMBERSHIP CORP.NE$1,250
GLENWOOD NETWORK SERVICESNE$1,250

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
CORNHUSKER MARRIOTTFUNDRAISING AUCTION-DINNER$12,297
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUESALES TAX REMITTANCE FROM 2014 NTA PAC AUCTION$848